WASHINGTON – The national outcry over the deaths of George Floyd, Rayshard Brooks, Breonna Taylor and other Black Americans at the hands of police has Congress moving with unusual speed to debate sweeping reforms such as bans on chokeholds and no-knock warrants.
The bill House Democrats are expected to bring to the floor Thursday goes further than the version Senate Republicans plan to call up this week.
But even if the chambers can agree on a final measure, there's a real question whether state and local law enforcement agencies will go along.
The proposals rely on the threat of a loss of federal funding for many of the suggested changes. When that has been tried in the past, federal oversight has been slow, and some states have determined that the funding cuts are smaller than the cost of complying.
“We already have examples of penalties leveraged,” said Chris Asplen, executive director of the National Criminal Justice Association, which represents state, local and tribal governments on crime control. “I would suggest they are not as effective as I think the originators would have liked them to be.”
Fractured skulls, lost eyes: Police break their own rules when shooting protesters with ‘rubber bullets’
Six years ago, activists pleaded for police reforms after Eric Garner, a 43-year-old Black father of six, died after New York City officer put him in chokehold and a Ferguson, Mo., officer fatally shot Michael Brown, an unarmed 18-year-old Black man.
Congress responded by requiring law enforcement agencies to report deaths that occur during custody.
But at the beginning of this year, the Justice Department still hadn’t adopted uniform procedures to collect reliable data or penalized any state for not complying.
In another example of the limits of Congress' power, fewer than half the states are certified as being in full compliance with a 2003 federal law to prevent sexual assaults in prisons. Only 18 have substantially implemented a sex offender registration program, created by a 2006 law, despite the threat of a cut in Justice Department grants for not participating.
The loss of federal dollars is one of the few cudgels the federal government has over state and local law enforcement as regulation is an area the Constitution generally entrusts to the states.
“If you think about the inability to have any grants, if your department has chokeholds, that frankly is, by default, a ban on chokeholds,” South Carolina Sen. Tim Scott said when Senate Republicans introduced their proposal Wednesday.
Breonna Taylor shooting: Louisville police is firing officer Brett Hankison
Congress most recently approved about $900 million for the two grant programs that would be used as leverage, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service.
That’s a significant amount but it’s less
0 Comments
if you have any issue let me know plz